Unconstitutional or Protection? Debating the Lummis-Gillibrand Stablecoin Act

Coin Center challenges the Lummis-Gillibrand Payment Stablecoin Act, advocating for a balanced approach to regulation that fosters innovation.

Unconstitutional or Protection? Debating the Lummis-Gillibrand Stablecoin Act

Stablecoin Regulation Controversy

Coin Center, a US-based advocacy group, recently criticized the newly introduced Lummis-Gillibrand Payment Stablecoin Act. This bipartisan legislation, aimed at regulating stablecoin use, was labeled as 'unconstitutional' and 'anti-innovation' by the group due to its strict prohibitions, particularly against algorithmic stablecoins.


Legislation Details

The bill requires stablecoin issuers to maintain one-to-one reserves and comply with anti-money laundering and sanctions regulations. Coin Center suggests that instead of outright banning algorithmic stablecoins, setting a registration requirement with the SEC would be more effective and less inhibitory to innovation.


Market Growth Amidst Regulation

Despite regulatory challenges, the global market cap for stablecoins rose by 21.95% in 2024. Tether (USDT) leads with a dominant market share, while USD Coin (USDC) also holds a significant presence. Coin Center emphasizes the need for reasonable regulations that do not hinder technology advancement or free speech.

Previous article

Institutional Investors Pivot Towards Bitcoin ETFs

Next article

Shiba Inu Eyes New Breakout Following Consolidation

Subscribe to get the latest Crypto Updates

Sign up to receive regular updates packed with exciting news and exclusive insights into upcoming crypto projects.